Detect equipment faults and abnormal operation before they become an emergency.

ThermoNext monitors runtime, cycling and temperatures for condominiums across Toronto and the GTA, so problems become planned work instead of emergencies.

Hydronic pumps, gauges, insulated headers and variable-frequency-drive cabinets.
01 — The cost of running to failure

Equipment rarely fails without warning. It fails without anyone watching.

Very few boilers, chillers or pumps stop working out of nowhere.

In most condominium buildings nobody reviews the trends, so the first sign of trouble is a no-heat call or water on the mechanical-room floor.

Short cycling

Frequent starts and stops wear equipment far faster than steady operation.

Drifting temperatures

Temperatures moving away from setpoint are an early sign of a developing problem.

Rising runtime

Equipment running longer to deliver the same output is asking for attention.

02 — Fault categories

Six fault categories, checked continuously.

Connected systems are checked continuously against fault rules tuned to the building.

Runtime & scheduling

  • Excessive cycling and runtime
  • Off-schedule operation

Controls & instrumentation

  • Sensor faults
  • Control and valve faults

Performance & condition

  • Degraded performance
  • Systems working against each other

Every fault is tracked to confirmed resolution.

03 — Early warning in practice

What a developing failure looks like in the data.

As a pump’s bearings wear, runtime creeps upward long before anything alarms. Catching that trend early makes the fix planned work instead of a failure in February.

Condominium central mechanical plant with boilers, pumps, insulated piping and controls.
04 — Asset protection

Protection for the asset, not just alarms for the equipment.

Asset protection adds the longer record — maintenance history, inspections and accumulated stress — so the board knows the true condition of its equipment.

  1. 4.1

    Operating-condition review

    Operating data reviewed against the equipment’s own history.

  2. 4.2

    Maintenance-record review

    Completed maintenance compared against what the equipment requires.

  3. 4.3

    Inspection logs

    Condition observations kept in one place and compared over time.

  4. 4.4

    Contractor-service history

    What was repaired, when, by whom and at what cost.

  5. 4.5

    Recurring-fault tracking

    Faults that return are flagged and escalated.

  6. 4.6

    Equipment stress indicators

    Which assets are aging faster than the calendar suggests.

  7. 4.7

    Capital-priority support

    Condition evidence assembled into a form the condo board can act on.

05 — Capital planning

Repeated faults are evidence, not anecdotes.

Sooner or later every major asset reaches the replace-versus-repair question.

A documented fault and condition history gives the board a factual basis for the decision. ThermoNext carries that evidence into board reporting.

Board reporting and capital planning

What the replace-versus-repair case draws on

  • Documented fault history
  • Repair frequency and cost
  • Runtime and cycling totals
  • Inspection observations
  • Remaining-service-life context
06 — Getting started

Start with a clear review of your building.

A preliminary review establishes which systems can be monitored with the trends your BAS already records.

Serving Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area.